Calling Developers!
We are reenergizing our code contribution process! Learn More

What are the Slack Archives?

Itโ€™s a history of our time together in the Slack Community! Thereโ€™s a ton of knowledge in here, so feel free to search through the archives for a possible answer to your question.

Because this space is not active, you wonโ€™t be able to create a new post or comment here. If you have a question or want to start a discussion about something, head over to our categories and pick one to post in! You can always refer back to a post from Slack Archives if needed; just copy the link to use it as a reference..

@U015S0C0V29 Right! Matthias is right to the point as usual ๐Ÿ™‚ In order to h

Options
Denis Turkov
Denis Turkov VP Architecture Sprykee Posts: 40 ๐Ÿ› - Council (mod)

@U015S0C0V29 Right! Matthias is right to the point as usual ๐Ÿ™‚

In order to have loosen dependency to a framework, of course you need to identify where is your Policy (the sacred gold of software - project specific business rules) and where is a Detail (gluing infrastructure). This way you can keep your Gold (Policies) decoupled from a framework.

How do you think, how Spryker architecture supports projects decoupling their Gold (Policies) from the framework? ๐Ÿ™‚

Comments

  • Chemaclass
    Chemaclass Tech Lead Spryker Solution Partner Posts: 213 ๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿš€ - Cadet
    Options

    I am actually pretty happy with the architecture behind Spryker. Way more happy that projects on top of Laravel or Symfony, for example. I think Spryker helps/push you to decouple your business logic from the framework better than any other framework out there. On the other hand, the cost is the high learning curve.